Skip to main content
Chattanooga Tree Pros

Local law · Tennessee & Chattanooga

Tennessee Neighbor-Tree Law for Chattanooga Homeowners: Who Pays, What You Can Cut, and When a Tree Is a Nuisance

In Tennessee, a neighbor's tree is their legal problem when it causes actual harm or poses an imminent danger of harm — not merely because it hangs over your line — under the Tennessee Supreme Court's 2002 decision in Lane v. W.J. Curry & Sons, which also preserved your right to cut encroaching branches and roots back to the property line at your own expense. Read October 2026. This page explains the rule, the Chattanooga ordinance sections that sit alongside it, and what to document.

Published October 25, 2026 · Figures and rules checked against the sources listed at the end of this page.

This page describes a published court decision and a city ordinance; it is not legal advice, and Chattanooga Tree Pros is not a law firm. For a dispute with real money in it, a Tennessee attorney is the right call.

The case that sets the rule: Lane v. W.J. Curry & Sons (Tenn. 2002)

Gloria Lane owned a house in Memphis next to a rental property owned by W.J. Curry & Sons. Three large oaks on the Curry lot sent limbs over her roof and roots under her yard. In 1997 a limb fell through her roof, attic and kitchen ceiling; rain followed and damaged ceilings, floors and her stove. The roots clogged her sewer line, sewage backed up into her tub, and she went about two years without a usable toilet, tub or sink. The trial court and the Court of Appeals threw her case out under the old rule — that a neighbor's only remedy for encroaching trees is to cut them back yourself ("self-help").

The Tennessee Supreme Court reversed on December 19, 2002. Chief Justice Drowota's opinion did three things that still govern every neighbor-tree dispute in the state:

  • 1. Encroaching trees can be a nuisance — when they do real harm The Court held that "encroaching trees and plants may be regarded as a nuisance when they cause actual harm or pose an imminent danger of actual harm to adjoining property." Encroachment alone — branches over the line, roots under it — is not enough.
  • 2. Self-help survives The neighbor may still, "at his own expense, cut away the encroaching vegetation to the property line," whether or not the tree is a nuisance. The Court kept that right and added to it.
  • 3. Self-help is not the only remedy Tennessee joined the states following the "Hawaii approach": when a tree causes actual harm or imminent danger, the owner can be sued for nuisance and made to pay damages or fix the problem. The Court found Ms. Lane's record enough to establish liability and sent the case back to decide damages.

What the rule means in practice

A healthy tree that falls in a storm

This is the most common Chattanooga situation — a sound oak or pine goes over in a spring wind event or an ice storm and lands on the neighbor's fence, car or roof. Under Lane the question is whether the tree caused actual harm or posed "an imminent danger of actual harm" — in practice, whether it was visibly failing before it fell. A healthy tree in a storm generally is not that, and in practice each property's own insurer usually handles its own damage. Nothing in the opinion makes a neighbor an insurer of every tree on their lot.

A tree the owner knew was a hazard

Different case. A tree that was visibly dead, hollow, split, leaning further every year, or already dropping big limbs is the Lane fact pattern: a condition the owner could see and did nothing about. That is where nuisance liability lives — and where the paper trail decides it. A dated letter with photos, sent before the tree fell, is what turns "they should have known" into "they knew".

Branches over the line, roots under it

You may cut both back to the property line yourself, at your expense, without asking. The limits are the ones any arborist would give you: do not enter the neighbor's land, do not cut the trunk, and do not cut so much that the tree dies or becomes unstable — at that point you have damaged their property, and Tennessee has a statute on damages for negligent or intentional tree cutting (Tenn. Code Ann. § 43-28-312, which the Chattanooga ordinance references; we have not reviewed it here). Hiring a crew that prunes to standard protects you here; the national range for a clearance prune is $400–$900 per tree, and the trimming page explains which cut to ask for.

Roots in the sewer line

The exact harm in Lane, and a common one on older Chattanooga lots with clay sewer laterals. Self-help (root cutting, a root barrier) remains available; if the damage is real and continuing, so does the nuisance claim.

Where the Chattanooga ordinance comes in

The 2025 Tree Ordinance is mostly about public trees and development, but three sections bear on neighbor disputes inside the city limits:

  • Sec. 32-311(d): "Property owners shall remove all dead, diseased or dangerous trees, or broken or decayed limbs which constitute a menace to the safety of the public." A hazard tree over a sidewalk or street is a code obligation, not just a neighborly one.
  • Sec. 32-315: The City "shall have the right to order or cause the removal of any trees that are dead or diseased on private property within the city, when such trees constitute a hazard to life and property, or harbor insects or disease" threatening other trees. The owner gets written notice and 14 days; if they don't act, the City removes the tree and bills them. Call 311 to report one.
  • Sec. 32-313: The ordinance says nothing in it removes "the State statutory liability and award of damages for negligent or intentional tree cutting as set forth in Tenn. Code Ann. § 43-28-312" — a statute this site has not reviewed.

Outside the city — Signal Mountain, Red Bank, East Ridge, Collegedale, Soddy-Daisy and unincorporated Hamilton County — the Lane rule is the same, because it is state law; the ordinance sections are not.

What to do, in order, when a neighbor's tree worries you

  1. Talk first. Most people do not know their tree is dying. A conversation and a shared quote settles most of these.
  2. Put it in writing. A short letter or email: what you see, a photo, a date, a request that they have it assessed. Keep a copy. This is the document that matters if the tree later fails.
  3. Get an assessment on paper. An arborist's written opinion that the tree is a hazard is evidence under Lane and is often what gets a reluctant neighbor to act. The dead-tree guide covers what the assessment looks for.
  4. Use self-help for the part on your side. Branches and roots to the line, pruned properly.
  5. Inside city limits, report a dead or diseased tree to 311 under Sec. 32-315.
  6. Talk to a lawyer if the tree has already caused damage or the neighbor will not act on a documented hazard.

If it has already fallen

Photograph the tree where it lies — especially the base and any rot, cavities or old failure points — before anyone cuts. Call your own insurer; they will deal with the neighbor's insurer if there is a knowledge question. Get the tree off the structure (the emergency page explains what that costs and who to call first), and keep the invoice itemized. The liability question is sorted out afterward; the roof is sorted out now.

Sources and dates

Every figure and rule above names where it came from and the date it was read. If a source disagrees with a quote you receive, the quote wins — it reflects your tree, your access, and this month's demand. Prices are rechecked at least every six months.

  1. Lane v. W.J. Curry & Sons, 92 S.W.3d 355 (Tenn. 2002), No. W2000-01580-SC-R11-CV, decided Dec. 19, 2002 (opinion by Drowota, C.J.) — read October 25, 2026. Read via FindLaw's mirror of the opinion; quotations are from the opinion text.
  2. Chattanooga City Code ch. 32, art. XIII (Chattanooga Tree Ordinance), Sec. 32-312(a)(10) and Sec. 32-313(d), Ord. No. 14217 (adopted Apr 8, 2025) — read October 25, 2026. Secs. 32-311(d) and 32-315 (dangerous and dead trees), 32-313 (reference to Tenn. Code Ann. § 43-28-312).

Neighbor-tree questions

My neighbor's tree fell on my house in Tennessee. Who pays?

Usually your own homeowner's insurance, in the first instance — insurers generally treat a healthy tree brought down by a storm as nobody's fault. The exception, under the Tennessee Supreme Court's 2002 decision in Lane v. W.J. Curry & Sons, is a tree the neighbor knew or should have known was a hazard: a tree that is dead, visibly decayed, or has already been dropping limbs can be a nuisance the neighbor is liable for. Document the tree's condition before anything is cut.

Can I cut my neighbor's branches that hang over my yard in Tennessee?

Yes, up to the property line and at your own expense. Lane v. Curry preserved that right of self-help and added that it is not your only remedy. Two limits: you cannot go onto the neighbor's land or cut the trunk, and cutting so much that you kill or destabilize the tree can make you the one liable. For anything substantial, tell the neighbor first and use a crew that prunes properly.

Can I make my neighbor remove a dangerous tree?

You can ask, in writing, with photos, and that letter matters later: it is the evidence that they knew. If the tree is inside Chattanooga city limits and genuinely dead or diseased, Sec. 32-315 of the city code lets the City order its removal, and Sec. 32-311(d) requires owners to remove dangerous trees that menace public safety. Beyond that, a nuisance claim in court is the remedy Lane v. Curry describes.

Who owns a tree on the property line?

The general common-law rule most states apply is that a tree whose trunk straddles the line is owned by both neighbors in common, so neither should remove it without the other's consent. We did not find a Tennessee appellate decision stating that rule and Lane v. Curry does not address it, so treat it as the likely answer and confirm with a lawyer before cutting a boundary tree. A tree whose trunk is wholly on one side belongs to that owner, wherever the branches and roots go.

Does Tennessee have an "act of God" rule for fallen trees?

We did not find a Tennessee statute or appellate case announcing one by that name, so this page does not cite one. The practical effect of Lane v. Curry is the same: liability turns on whether the owner knew or should have known of a hazard, and a storm taking down a healthy tree is not that.